 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9124 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-05-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9124 and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, RealBench, Furmark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Blender, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Blender, SuperPi, MATLAB, Gears 5, WPrime, 7zip.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9124 or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 64% |
EPYC 9124 | 62% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4416+ is 3% better than EPYC 9124. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 67% |
EPYC 9124 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 118.0 | 112.7 | | Valorant | 134.1 | 128.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 71.7 | | Apex Legends | 126.1 | 120.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 96.0 | | Overwatch | 108.6 | 103.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.6 | 88.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.1 | 64.0 | | Warzone | 104.6 | 99.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 112.7 | 107.5 | | Valheim | 111.3 | 106.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 24% |
EPYC 9124 | 20% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4416+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9124 as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1057 | 110 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3419 | 5178 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2350 | 220 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8442 | 10991 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1634 | 566 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48070 | 28606 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 14924 | 1293 | | Multi-Core | 48932 | 41968 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Single-Core | 1225 | 1206 | | Multi-Core | 29446 | 24169 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9124 | | Announcement date | March 28, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 20 | 16 | | Threads | 40 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 200 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000802
100-100000802WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9124 is 33% better than Xeon Silver 4416+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4416+ has 4 more core than EPYC 9124. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9124 is better: 9
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 9124 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 9124 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
|
|
|
