|
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7453 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7453 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, SuperPi, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Blender. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7453 or Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 52% |
EPYC 7453 | 64% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7453 is 18% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Bronze 3408U | 54% |
EPYC 7453 | 65% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.0 | 115.3 | Valorant | 109.1 | 131.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.1 | 73.4 | Apex Legends | 102.6 | 123.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.8 | 98.3 | Overwatch | 88.4 | 106.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.3 | 90.4 | DOOM Eternal | 54.6 | 65.5 | Warzone | 85.1 | 102.2 | Assassin's Creed | 91.6 | 110.1 | Valheim | 90.6 | 108.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 20% |
EPYC 7453 | 19% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Bronze 3408U is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7453 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7453 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 161 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 759 | 6079 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 277 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1693 | 12884 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 681 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4251 | 33504 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7453 | Single-Core | 122 | 1434 | Multi-Core | 8325 | 49146 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7453 | Single-Core | 786 | 1298 | Multi-Core | 7851 | 26811 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7453 | Announcement date | March 23, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.45 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.75 MHz | Cores | 8 | 28 | Threads | 8 | 56 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 64MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000319 100-100000319WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7453 is 34% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7453 has 20 more core than Xeon Bronze 3408U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7453 is better: 26 However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U and AMD EPYC 7453 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7453 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|