Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7453 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, PCMark 10, PassMark, MATLAB, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Geekbench 5.2, Furmark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, Blender, Handbrake, Blender. And how good the processors are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX or AMD EPYC 7453.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7453 | 72% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 91% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 20% better than EPYC 7453. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7453 | 73% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 81% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.4 | 144.2 | Valorant | 147.1 | 163.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.4 | 91.7 | Apex Legends | 138.3 | 154.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.3 | 122.9 | Overwatch | 119.1 | 132.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.5 | 113.0 | DOOM Eternal | 73.5 | 81.9 | Warzone | 114.7 | 127.8 | Assassin's Creed | 123.6 | 137.6 | Valheim | 122.1 | 136.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7453 | 19% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 15% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7453 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6079 | 11525 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 277 | 477 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12884 | 24463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 681 | 1231 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33504 | 73220 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1434 | 2691 | Multi-Core | 49146 | 89165 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1298 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 26811 | 36342 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.45 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 28 | 64 | Threads | 56 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 4MB | L2 cache | | 32MB | L3 cache | 64MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000319 100-100000319WOF
| 100-000000087
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7453 is 1% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 36 more core than EPYC 7453. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7453 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is better: 25 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7453 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r23 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r15 score • GeekBench 5 score • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7702 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
|