Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7453 vs AMD EPYC 7663 and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Gears 5, MATLAB, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Prime95, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Geekbench 5.2, VeraCrypt, Furmark, RealBench, Blender, 7zip, 3DMark, Handbrake, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or AMD EPYC 7453.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7453 | 72% |
EPYC 7663 | 78% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 7% better than EPYC 7453. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7453 | 73% |
EPYC 7663 | 90% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.4 | 159.3 | Valorant | 147.1 | 181.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.4 | 101.4 | Apex Legends | 138.3 | 170.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.3 | 135.8 | Overwatch | 119.1 | 146.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.5 | 124.9 | DOOM Eternal | 73.5 | 90.5 | Warzone | 114.7 | 141.2 | Assassin's Creed | 123.6 | 152.1 | Valheim | 122.1 | 150.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7453 | 19% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7453 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6079 | 7606 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 277 | 347 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12884 | 16121 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 681 | 852 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33504 | 41920 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 1434 | 1794 | Multi-Core | 49146 | 61492 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 1298 | 874 | Multi-Core | 26811 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7453 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.45 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 28 | 56 | Threads | 56 | 112 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 78000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 240 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000319 100-100000319WOF
| 100-000000318 100-100000318WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7453 is 27% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 28 more core than EPYC 7453. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7453 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7453 and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7663 • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7663 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900HK Vs EPYC 7663 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7663
|