 |
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-12900F |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-12900F and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Blender, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PassMark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, Prime95. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900F or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Core i9-12900F | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900F is 7% better than Core i5-13500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Core i9-12900F | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 104.5 | Valorant | 117.6 | 118.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 66.5 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 111.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 89.1 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 96.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 81.9 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 59.4 | Warzone | 91.8 | 92.6 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 99.8 | Valheim | 97.6 | 98.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Core i9-12900F | 97% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 449 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 4734 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 750 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 10524 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 2661 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 30285 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 1671 | 6936 | Multi-Core | 35293 | 51775 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 1782 | 1904 | Multi-Core | 15214 | 16188 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 15% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900F has 2 more core than Core i5-13500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 27 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500T and Intel Core i9-12900F before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
| |
|