 |
Intel Core i5-13500T vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700E |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13500T vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700E and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Gears 5, PCMark 10, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, WPrime, 7zip, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, MATLAB, Prime95, Furmark, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 2700E or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Ryzen 7 2700E | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500T is 10% better than Ryzen 7 2700E. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Ryzen 7 2700E | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 95.7 | | Valorant | 117.6 | 108.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 60.9 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 102.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 81.5 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 88.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 75.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 84.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 91.3 | | Valheim | 97.6 | 90.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Ryzen 7 2700E | 75% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 2700E as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 152 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 1364 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 387 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 3065 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 953 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 8056 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | | Single-Core | 1671 | 2385 | | Multi-Core | 35293 | 14613 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | | Single-Core | 1782 | 1022 | | Multi-Core | 15214 | 7511 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | September 01, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Pinnacle Ridge | | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | | Generation | 13 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 3800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 768KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD270EBHM88AF
YD270EBHAFMPK
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500T is 12% better than Ryzen 7 2700E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 6 more core than Ryzen 7 2700E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 35
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500T and AMD Ryzen 7 2700E before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
|
|
|
