|
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i7-11700KF |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i7-11700KF tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Furmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, WPrime, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Gears 5, Handbrake, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, MATLAB. And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11700KF or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Core i7-11700KF | 58% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500T is 3% better than Core i7-11700KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Core i7-11700KF | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 99.1 | Valorant | 117.6 | 112.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 63.1 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 105.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 84.5 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 91.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 77.7 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 56.3 | Warzone | 91.8 | 87.9 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 94.6 | Valheim | 97.6 | 93.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Core i7-11700KF | 47% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-11700KF since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i7-11700KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 259 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 2482 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 606 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 5562 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 1580 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 14720 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i7-11700KF | Single-Core | 1671 | 3526 | Multi-Core | 35293 | 26855 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i7-11700KF | Single-Core | 1782 | 1793 | Multi-Core | 15214 | 10909 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i7-11700KF | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake-S | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 12 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-11700KF is 11% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 6 more core than Core i7-11700KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11700KF is better: 6 The summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500T and Intel Core i7-11700KF before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i7-11700KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-13490F
| |
|