|
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-13500T |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-13500T and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Gears 5, Blender, 3DMark, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13500T or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i5-13500T | 60% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500T is 1% better than Core i3-13300F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i5-13500T | 58% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 103.5 | Valorant | 109.5 | 117.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 65.9 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 110.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 88.2 | Overwatch | 88.7 | 95.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 81.2 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 58.8 | Warzone | 85.4 | 91.8 | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 98.8 | Valheim | 90.9 | 97.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i5-13500T | 169% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i3-13300F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-13500T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 317 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 3243 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 524 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 7202 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1829 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 20710 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-13500T | Single-Core | 1492 | 1671 | Multi-Core | 31087 | 35293 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-13500T | Single-Core | 1875 | 1782 | Multi-Core | 8179 | 15214 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-13500T | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | January 14, 2023 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 14 | Threads | 12 | 20 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 12 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500T is 6% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 6 more core than Core i3-13300F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 31 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i5-13500T before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
| |
|