 |
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-7900X |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-7900X and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, PCMark 10, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Furmark, 7zip, RealBench, Blender, Blender, Prime95, Handbrake, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-7900X or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Core i9-7900X | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500T is 6% better than Core i9-7900X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Core i9-7900X | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Control, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 100.3 | | Valorant | 117.6 | 114.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 63.8 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 107.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 85.5 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 92.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 78.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 57.0 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 88.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 95.8 | | Valheim | 97.6 | 94.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Core i9-7900X | 29% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-7900X since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 140W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-7900X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 188 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 2194 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 461 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 5286 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 1222 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 14998 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-7900X | | Single-Core | 1671 | 2579 | | Multi-Core | 35293 | 21477 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-7900X | | Single-Core | 1782 | 1237 | | Multi-Core | 15214 | 12083 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-7900X | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | April 01, 2017 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA2066 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Skylake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 10 | | Threads | 20 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 140 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 85 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 13.75 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-7900X is 3% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 4 more core than Core i9-7900X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-7900X is better: 4
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500T and Intel Core i9-7900X before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-7900X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
|
|
|
