|
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Apple M2 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13500T vs Apple M2 Pro and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, PCMark 10, PassMark, Blender, AIDA64, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, MATLAB, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500T | 60% |
M2 Pro | 61% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Pro is 1% better than Core i5-13500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500T | 58% |
M2 Pro | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 104.8 | Valorant | 117.6 | 119.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 66.7 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 111.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 89.3 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 96.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 82.2 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 59.5 | Warzone | 91.8 | 92.9 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 100.0 | Valheim | 97.6 | 98.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500T | 169% |
M2 Pro | 496% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 14W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Apple M2 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 366 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 2078 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 714 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 3555 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 2063 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 16023 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1671 | 6111 | Multi-Core | 35293 | 39485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Apple M2 Pro | Single-Core | 1782 | 2085 | Multi-Core | 15214 | 16467 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Apple M2 Pro | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 14 | 12 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 14 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 36MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Pro is 8% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500T has 2 more core than M2 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Pro is better: 25 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500T and Apple M2 Pro before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Apple M2 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|