 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 vs Intel Core i3-10105T |
|
Processor comparisons 30-06-2021
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-1068NG7 vs Intel Core i3-10105T and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Furmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, WPrime, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10105T or Intel Core i7-1068NG7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-1068NG7 | 53% |
Core i3-10105T | 52% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1068NG7 is 1% better than Core i3-10105T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-1068NG7 | 52% |
Core i3-10105T | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.0 | 91.9 | | Valorant | 105.7 | 104.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.2 | 58.5 | | Apex Legends | 99.3 | 98.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.3 | 78.4 | | Overwatch | 85.6 | 84.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.9 | 72.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.8 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 82.4 | 81.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.8 | 87.8 | | Valheim | 87.7 | 86.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-1068NG7 | 159% |
Core i3-10105T | 112% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1068NG7 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10105T since it has less power consumption: 28W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
Intel Core i3-10105T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 193 | 189 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | | 991 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 461 | 443 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1756 | 2261 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1249 | 1132 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | | 4396 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
Intel Core i3-10105T | | Single-Core | 2613 | 2590 | | Multi-Core | 10763 | 8798 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
Intel Core i3-10105T | | Single-Core | 1339 | 1186 | | Multi-Core | 4894 | 3862 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
Intel Core i3-10105T | | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1344 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Ice Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 10 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 2600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 58.3 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10105T is 23% better than Core i7-1068NG7 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1068NG7 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105T is better: 6
However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-1068NG7 and Intel Core i3-10105T before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i3-10105T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
|
|
|
