 |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i7-1068NG7 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, MATLAB, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, PassMark, Handbrake, Prime95, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1068NG7 or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N300 is 1% better than Core i7-1068NG7. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Control, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 93.0 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 105.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 59.2 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 99.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 79.3 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 85.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 72.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.8 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 82.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 88.8 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 87.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 159% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-1068NG7 as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 28W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 193 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 461 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 1756 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1249 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Single-Core | 2510 | 2613 | | Multi-Core | 15340 | 10763 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Single-Core | 1047 | 1339 | | Multi-Core | 4058 | 4894 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1344 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Ice Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 28 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 58.3 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1068NG7 is 24% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N300 has 4 more core than Core i7-1068NG7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1068NG7 is better: 20
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Core i7-1068NG7 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
