|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i3-1000NG4 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i3-1000NG4 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, 3DMark, WPrime, SuperPi, RealBench, MATLAB, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Furmark, 7zip, Blender, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1000NG4 or AMD Ryzen 5 3500C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3500C | 52% |
Core i3-1000NG4 | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 3500C is 1% better than Core i3-1000NG4. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 3500C | 51% |
Core i3-1000NG4 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 90.5 | Valorant | 103.5 | 102.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 57.6 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 96.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.7 | 77.2 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 83.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 71.0 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 51.4 | Warzone | 80.8 | 80.2 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 86.4 | Valheim | 85.9 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 3500C | 195% |
Core i3-1000NG4 | 407% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1000NG4 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 3500C as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 9W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 142 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 326 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 356 | 348 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1468 | 612 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 867 | 576 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3509 | 2236 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 | Single-Core | 1994 | 1967 | Multi-Core | 7127 | 4473 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 | Single-Core | 881 | 1099 | Multi-Core | 3057 | 2487 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | July 07, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | BGA1526 | Core name | Picasso | Ice Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 1.1 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 9 W | Memory type | | LPDDR4-3733 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 58.3 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM350CC4T4MFG
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 3500C is 47% better than Core i3-1000NG4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 3500C has 2 more core than Core i3-1000NG4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500C is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1000NG4 is better: 8 All the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 3500C and Intel Core i3-1000NG4 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
| |
|