|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i3-1005G1 |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i3-1005G1 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AIDA64, Prime95, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, PassMark, Gears 5, PCMark 10, 7zip, SuperPi, WPrime. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1005G1 or AMD Ryzen 5 3500C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3500C | 52% |
Core i3-1005G1 | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 3500C is 1% better than Core i3-1005G1. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 3500C | 51% |
Core i3-1005G1 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Control, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 90.5 | Valorant | 103.5 | 102.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 57.6 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 96.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.7 | 77.1 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 83.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 71.0 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 51.4 | Warzone | 80.8 | 80.2 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 86.4 | Valheim | 85.9 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 3500C | 195% |
Core i3-1005G1 | 266% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1005G1 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 3500C since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 158 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 409 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 356 | 402 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1468 | 949 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 867 | 675 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3509 | 2621 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Single-Core | 1994 | 2281 | Multi-Core | 7127 | 5244 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Single-Core | 881 | 1197 | Multi-Core | 3057 | 2465 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1526 | Core name | Picasso | Ice Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 58.3 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM350CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 3500C is 42% better than Core i3-1005G1 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 3500C has 2 more core than Core i3-1005G1. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500C is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1005G1 is better: 10 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 3500C and Intel Core i3-1005G1 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i3-1005G1 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|