|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i5-9300HF |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i5-9300HF and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9300HF or AMD Ryzen 5 3500C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3500C | 52% |
Core i5-9300HF | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 3500C | 51% |
Core i5-9300HF | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 92.3 | Valorant | 103.5 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.7 | 78.7 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 85.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 52.5 | Warzone | 80.8 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 88.1 | Valheim | 85.9 | 87.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 3500C | 195% |
Core i5-9300HF | 81% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 3500C is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9300HF since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 156 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 593 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 356 | 422 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1468 | 2111 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 867 | 1024 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3509 | 4015 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Single-Core | 1994 | 2332 | Multi-Core | 7127 | 7619 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Single-Core | 881 | 1100 | Multi-Core | 3057 | 4228 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Coffee Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s DMI | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM350CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9300HF is 12% better than Ryzen 5 3500C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500C is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9300HF is better: 28 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 3500C and Intel Core i5-9300HF before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i5-9300HF Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K
| |
|