 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i5-7300HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 5 3500C vs Intel Core i5-7300HQ and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Prime95, AIDA64, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, Blender, RealBench, 7zip, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Furmark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-7300HQ or AMD Ryzen 5 3500C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 3500C | 52% |
Core i5-7300HQ | 51% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 3500C is 1% better than Core i5-7300HQ. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 3500C | 51% |
Core i5-7300HQ | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 91.1 | Valorant | 103.5 | 103.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 58.0 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 97.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.7 | 77.6 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 83.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 71.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 51.8 | Warzone | 80.8 | 80.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 87.0 | Valheim | 85.9 | 85.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 3500C | 195% |
Core i5-7300HQ | 66% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 3500C is more energy efficient than the Core i5-7300HQ as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 143 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 541 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 356 | 288 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1468 | 1083 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 867 | 789 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3509 | 2824 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | Single-Core | 1994 | 2001 | Multi-Core | 7127 | 5134 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | Single-Core | 881 | 900 | Multi-Core | 3057 | 3045 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | January 01, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Kaby Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 2100 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM350CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-7300HQ is 15% better than Ryzen 5 3500C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500C is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-7300HQ is better: 10 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 3500C and Intel Core i5-7300HQ before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i5-7300HQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|