MediaTek MT6595 vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6595 vs MediaTek MT6750, compare of GPUs PowerVR G6200 and Mali-T860 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6595 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, and how good the SoCs are in games Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6595 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595

22%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595	MT6750
Total score	50568	40481
CPU	14157	11332
GPU	19211	15386
MEM	8090	6480
UX	9092	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595	MT6750
Single-Core	130	107
Multi-Core	589	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595	MT6750
Frequency	2200 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	6	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595 is 31% better than MT6750 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR G6200	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	76.8	35.3
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	16.3	12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	42.9	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.3	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.9	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.9	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	53.7	41.3
Real Racing 3	49.5	37.1
Sniper 3D	53.8	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	50.9	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	45.3	30.7
CSR Racing 2	31.1	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 2
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6595 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6595 specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.