MediaTek MT8163 vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 vs MediaTek MT6750, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8163 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, Geekbench, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the processors are in games Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MT8163 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8163

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8163

24%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8163

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8163	MT6750
Total score	33420	40481
CPU	9348	11332
GPU	12697	15386
MEM	5343	6480
UX	6016	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8163	MT6750
Single-Core	88	107
Multi-Core	408	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8163	MT6750
Frequency	1300 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6750 is 13% better than MT8163 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8163 has 4 more core than MT6750. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	520 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	17.68	35.3
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	9.5	12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	26.5	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	17.9	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.6	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	21.5	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	33.3	41.3
Real Racing 3	26.9	37.1
Sniper 3D	23.3	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	32.2	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	20.6	30.7
CSR Racing 2	25.1	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8163 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8163 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT8163 specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.