HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs MediaTek MT6750, comparison of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 655 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as PassMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Octane V2, Geekbench, Neocore, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 655 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 655

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 655

50%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 655

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 655	MT6750
Total score	58741	40481
CPU	16437	11332
GPU	22321	15386
MEM	9401	6480
UX	10563	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 655	MT6750
Single-Core	152	107
Multi-Core	684	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 655	MT6750
Frequency	2100 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	667
Memory bandwidth		6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 655 is 28% better than MT6750 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T830 MP2	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	61.2	35.3
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	13.5	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	21.3	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	13.5	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.2	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	13.9	41.3
Real Racing 3	37.3	37.1
Sniper 3D	40.5	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	25.6	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	30.9	30.7
CSR Racing 2	25.6	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 655 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 11
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 655 and MT6750, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 655 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 655 specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.