MediaTek MT6580 vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6580 vs MediaTek MT6750, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D etc.

After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MT6580 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6580

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6580

27%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6580

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6580	MT6750
Total score	20999	40481
CPU	5884	11332
GPU	7987	15386
MEM	3365	6480
UX	3787	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6580	MT6750
Single-Core	55	107
Multi-Core	256	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6580	MT6750
Frequency	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	1 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	667
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6580 has 4 more core than MT6750. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	8.4	35.3
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.7	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	11.2	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.8	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.2	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	21.2	41.3
Real Racing 3	16.8	37.1
Sniper 3D	21.3	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	13.4	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	16.2	30.7
CSR Racing 2	13.4	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 29
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6580 specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.