MediaTek MT6595M vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6595M vs MediaTek MT6750, comparison of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-T860 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MT6595M or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595M

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595M

24%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595M

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595M	MT6750
Total score	60152	40481
CPU	16841	11332
GPU	22865	15386
MEM	9626	6480
UX	10822	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595M	MT6750
Single-Core	155	107
Multi-Core	700	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595M	MT6750
Frequency	2000 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	14	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595M is 25% better than MT6750 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	357 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	11.48	35.3
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.9	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.7	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.2	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.2	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	41.3
Real Racing 3	39.4	37.1
Sniper 3D	25.6	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	23.6	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	22.7	30.7
CSR Racing 2	25.6	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 17
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6595M and MT6750, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.