|
Intel Atom Z3590 vs MediaTek MT6750 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom Z3590 vs MediaTek MT6750, comparison of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and PowerVR G6430. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Octane V2, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Atom Z3590 or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z3590 |
MT6750 | Total score | 49101 | 40481 | CPU | 13755 | 11332 | GPU | 18661 | 15386 | MEM | 7866 | 6480 | UX | 8833 | 7289 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z3590 |
MT6750 | Single-Core | 130 | 107 | Multi-Core | 600 | 494 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z3590 |
MT6750 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz Moorefield | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 13 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 40% better than MT6750 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom Z3590 has 4 more core than MT6750. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR G6430 | Mali-T860 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 640 MHz | 520 MHz | GFloPS | 163.78 | 35.3 | # of Cores | 4 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 16.5 | 12.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 41.7 | 32.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.5 | 21.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.6 | 18.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 34.6 | 27.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 51.5 | 41.3 | Real Racing 3 | 48.1 | 37.1 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 33.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 49.5 | 33.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 39.9 | 30.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.8 | 23.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 5 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Atom Z3590 and MT6750, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z3590 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
MT6750 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|