MediaTek MT6739WW vs MediaTek MT6750

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6739WW vs MediaTek MT6750, comparison of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and PowerVR GE8100.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6739WW is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6750 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Octane V2, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6739WW or MT6750 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WW

MT6750

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WW

29%

MT6750

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WW

MT6750

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WW	MT6750
Total score	35685	40481
CPU	9986	11332
GPU	13560	15386
MEM	5708	6480
UX	6433	7289

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WW	MT6750
Single-Core	94	107
Multi-Core	436	494

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WW	MT6750
Frequency	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6739WW has 4 more core than MT6750. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8100	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	570 MHz	520 MHz
GFloPS	11.2	35.3
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.2	12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.3	32.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.6	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.4	18.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	24.4	27.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	36.8	41.3
Real Racing 3	37.2	37.1
Sniper 3D	29.8	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	29.8	33.9
Mortal Kombat X	27	30.7
CSR Racing 2	22.3	23.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WW is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6739WW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WW specs and review.

MT6750 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6750 specs and review.