 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i7-11850H |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i7-11850H and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Furmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, WPrime, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11850H or AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 64% |
Core i7-11850H | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7940HS is 10% better than Core i7-11850H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 61% |
Core i7-11850H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.5 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 122.1 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.4 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 114.8 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.6 | 82.5 | | Overwatch | 98.9 | 89.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.3 | 75.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.1 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 95.2 | 85.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.6 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 101.4 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 165% |
Core i7-11850H | 130% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 7940HS is more energy efficient than the Core i7-11850H since it has less power consumption: 40W vs. 40W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 313 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4426 | 2281 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 667 | 747 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10551 | 5178 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1669 | 1749 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28954 | 17071 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 3505 | 4095 | | Multi-Core | 46681 | 23900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 1986 | 1563 | | Multi-Core | 19074 | 8575 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | March 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Phoenix | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 40 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 512KB | | | L2 cache | 8MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000954 (FP7r2)
100-000000963 (FP7)
100-000001128 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 7940HS is 37% better than Core i7-11850H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11850H is better: 8
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel Core i7-11850H before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-11850H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
