 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i9-11900H |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i9-11900H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 7zip, Furmark, WPrime, PCMark 10, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, PassMark, AIDA64, RealBench, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11900H or AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 64% |
Core i9-11900H | 58% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7940HS is 9% better than Core i9-11900H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 61% |
Core i9-11900H | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.5 | 98.3 | | Valorant | 122.1 | 111.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.4 | 62.6 | | Apex Legends | 114.8 | 105.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.6 | 83.8 | | Overwatch | 98.9 | 90.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.3 | 77.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.1 | 55.9 | | Warzone | 95.2 | 87.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.6 | 93.9 | | Valheim | 101.4 | 92.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 165% |
Core i9-11900H | 45% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 7940HS is more energy efficient than the Core i9-11900H as it consumes less power: 40W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i9-11900H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 293 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4426 | 2652 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 667 | 655 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10551 | 5897 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1669 | 1703 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28954 | 16969 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i9-11900H | | Single-Core | 3505 | 3915 | | Multi-Core | 46681 | 29011 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i9-11900H | | Single-Core | 1986 | 1705 | | Multi-Core | 19074 | 10136 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i9-11900H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | February 21, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Phoenix | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 125 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 512KB | | | L2 cache | 8MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000954 (FP7r2)
100-000000963 (FP7)
100-000001128 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 7940HS is 12% better than Core i9-11900H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11900H is better: 6
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel Core i9-11900H before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-11900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
