 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, MATLAB, AIDA64, PassMark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Blender, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, WPrime, Blender, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS or AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 64% |
Ryzen 9 5980HS | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7940HS is 10% better than Ryzen 9 5980HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 61% |
Ryzen 9 5980HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.5 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 122.1 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.4 | 61.5 | | Apex Legends | 114.8 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.6 | 82.4 | | Overwatch | 98.9 | 89.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.3 | 75.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.1 | 54.9 | | Warzone | 95.2 | 85.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.6 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 101.4 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 165% |
Ryzen 9 5980HS | 146% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 7940HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 5980HS as it consumes less power: 40W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 245 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4426 | 2370 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 667 | 570 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10551 | 5196 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1669 | 1475 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28954 | 13222 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | | Single-Core | 3505 | 3158 | | Multi-Core | 46681 | 26144 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | | Single-Core | 1986 | 1536 | | Multi-Core | 19074 | 8510 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 12, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FP6 | | Core name | Phoenix | Cezanne | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 6 | 5 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 9400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz
LPDDR4 - Up to 4266MHz | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 512KB | | | L2 cache | 8MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000954 (FP7r2)
100-000000963 (FP7)
100-000001128 (FP8)
| 100-000000474
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 7940HS is 25% better than Ryzen 9 5980HS in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is better: 2
The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
|
|
|
