 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i5-12500H |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i5-12500H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PassMark, 7zip, 3DMark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Furmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, WPrime, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Handbrake, Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500H or AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 64% |
Core i5-12500H | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7940HS is 10% better than Core i5-12500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 61% |
Core i5-12500H | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.5 | 98.6 | | Valorant | 122.1 | 112.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.4 | 62.7 | | Apex Legends | 114.8 | 105.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.6 | 84.0 | | Overwatch | 98.9 | 90.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.3 | 77.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.1 | 56.0 | | Warzone | 95.2 | 87.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.6 | 94.1 | | Valheim | 101.4 | 93.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | 165% |
Core i5-12500H | 143% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 7940HS is more energy efficient than the Core i5-12500H since it has less power consumption: 40W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 312 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4426 | 2282 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 667 | 748 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10551 | 5183 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1669 | 1749 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28954 | 17085 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Single-Core | 3505 | 4099 | | Multi-Core | 46681 | 23919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Single-Core | 1986 | 1721 | | Multi-Core | 19074 | 10346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Phoenix | Alder Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 40 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 512KB | | | L2 cache | 8MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000954 (FP7r2)
100-000000963 (FP7)
100-000001128 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 7940HS is 17% better than Core i5-12500H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-12500H has 4 more core than Ryzen 9 7940HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500H is better: 9
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel Core i5-12500H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-12500H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
