|
MediaTek MT6575 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 304 and PowerVR SGX531. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Neocore, 3DMark, Octane V2, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, and how good the chipsets are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MT6575 or Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6575 | 1% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6575 | -4% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6575 | 1% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6575 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Total score | 10235 | 17414 | CPU | 2875 | 4876 | GPU | 3891 | 6623 | MEM | 1627 | 2785 | UX | 1834 | 3134 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6575 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Single-Core | 27 | 46 | Multi-Core | 125 | 212 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6575 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 1 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9 | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR 2/3 | Max. Memory | 0.5 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is 9% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Snapdragon 210 MSM8909. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX531 | Adreno 304 | GPU Frequency | 216 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 2.24 | 19.2 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 840 x 480 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 1.8 | 5.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 7.5 | 14.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 3.6 | 8.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 3.1 | 8.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 5.9 | 11.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 9.1 | 17.5 | Real Racing 3 | 7.2 | 10.1 | Sniper 3D | 5.8 | 13 | Need for Speed No Limits | 6.5 | 13 | Mortal Kombat X | 4.1 | 11.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 4.7 | 8.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 5 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Upload speed | | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is better: 34 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6575 and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6575 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
| |
|