|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 304 and Adreno 306. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 or Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 410 MSM8916 | 2% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 | 22% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 410 MSM8916 | 1% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Total score | 31881 | 17414 | CPU | 8934 | 4876 | GPU | 12115 | 6623 | MEM | 5100 | 2785 | UX | 5745 | 3134 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Single-Core | 84 | 46 | Multi-Core | 389 | 212 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2/3 | LPDDR 2/3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 533 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 is 8% better than Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 306 | Adreno 304 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 21.6 | 19.2 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 24 | 24 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 9.5 | 5.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.1 | 14.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 16.3 | 8.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.2 | 8.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 20.7 | 11.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 32.5 | 17.5 | Real Racing 3 | 20.4 | 10.1 | Sniper 3D | 35.9 | 13 | Need for Speed No Limits | 22.8 | 13 | Mortal Kombat X | 23.6 | 11.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 17.9 | 8.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is better: 0 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|