|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, comparison of GPUs Adreno 304 and Adreno 203. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A5) and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, Octane V2, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 or Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 | 1% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 | -54% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 | 1% |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Total score | 17324 | 17414 | CPU | 4859 | 4876 | GPU | 6585 | 6623 | MEM | 2774 | 2785 | UX | 3128 | 3134 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Single-Core | 60 | 46 | Multi-Core | 211 | 212 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 |
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 1 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A5 | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR 2/3 | Max. Memory | 0.5 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 333 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is 9% better than Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 has 3 more core than Snapdragon 210 MSM8909. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 203 | Adreno 304 | GPU Frequency | 245 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 7.8 | 19.2 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 16 | 24 | Display | 854 x 480 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 4.5 | 5.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 13.2 | 14.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 7.4 | 8.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 7.2 | 8.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.4 | 11.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 16.6 | 17.5 | Real Racing 3 | 9.3 | 10.1 | Sniper 3D | 11.8 | 13 | Need for Speed No Limits | 10.4 | 13 | Mortal Kombat X | 9.6 | 11.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 8.9 | 8.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 5 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Upload speed | | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 and Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|