Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, comparison of GPUs Adreno 305 and Adreno 203.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A5) and Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 or Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

 
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM82251% Snapdragon 400 MSM89281%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225-54% Snapdragon 400 MSM892827%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM82251% Snapdragon 400 MSM89281%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Total score1732421723
CPU48596078
GPU65858251
MEM27743472
UX31283901

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Single-Core6057
Multi-Core211265

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Frequency1000 MHz1600 MHz
Cores14
Bit3264
Lithography65 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A54x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)4 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2/3
Max. Memory0.5 Gb2 Gb
Memory Frequency333533
Memory bandwidth66
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is 37% better than Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 has 3 more core than Snapdragon 400 MSM8928. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 203Adreno 305
GPU Frequency245 MHz450 MHz
GFloPS7.821.6
# of Cores
# of Shader Units1624
Display854 x 480 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile4.55.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)13.216.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra7.410.9
Call of Duty: Mobile7.28.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)10.412.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition16.620.2
Real Racing 39.319.1
Sniper 3D11.814.2
Need for Speed No Limits10.419.6
Mortal Kombat X9.617.4
CSR Racing 28.914.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution5 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is better: 32
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 and Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands