Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs MediaTek MT8312CW

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 vs MediaTek MT8312CW, compare of GPUs Adreno 203 and Mali-400.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A5) and MT8312CW is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 or MT8312CW and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

MT8312CW

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

-54%

MT8312CW

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225

MT8312CW

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	MT8312CW
Total score	17324	12158
CPU	4859	3404
GPU	6585	4628
MEM	2774	1945
UX	3128	2178

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	MT8312CW
Single-Core	60	32
Multi-Core	211	148

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225	MT8312CW
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A5	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	333	433
Memory bandwidth	6	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312CW is 16% better than Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 has 1 more core than MT8312CW. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 203	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	245 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	7.8	3.6
# of Cores		1
# of Shader Units	16
Display	854 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	4.5	1.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	13.2	8.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	7.4	4.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	7.2	3.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.4	5.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	16.6	10.1
Real Racing 3	9.3	7.7
Sniper 3D	11.8	8.4
Need for Speed No Limits	10.4	6.2
Mortal Kombat X	9.6	5.7
CSR Racing 2	8.9	5.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312CW is better: 10
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 and MT8312CW, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 specs and review.

MT8312CW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312CW specs and review.