MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 9611

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 9611, compare of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and PowerVR GE8320.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Octane V2, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT8768T or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Exynos 9611
Total score	93268	155435
CPU	26105	43530
GPU	35434	59071
MEM	14916	24864
UX	16782	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	241	318
Multi-Core	1086	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Exynos 9611
Frequency	2300 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1866
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	161
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	39.5
Real Racing 3	42.1	57.3
Sniper 3D	74.1	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	73.3
CSR Racing 2	43.8	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT8768T and Exynos 9611, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.