Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 9611 benchmark which processor is better

Tiger T310 vs Exynos 9611

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 9611, compare of GPUs Mali-G71 MP2 and Mali-G72 MP3.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T310 or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T310

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T310

64%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T310

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T310	Exynos 9611
Total score	102948	155435
CPU	28818	43530
GPU	39119	59071
MEM	16471	24864
UX	18534	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T310	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	210	318
Multi-Core	926	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T310	Exynos 9611
Frequency	2000 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1866
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 13% better than Tiger T310 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Tiger T310 has 4 more core than Exynos 9611. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP2	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	770 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	52.3	161
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	23.7	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	38.5	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.4	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	19.8	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	24.1	39.5
Real Racing 3	67.4	57.3
Sniper 3D	61.6	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	61.6	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	61.6	73.3
CSR Racing 2	42.4	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Tiger T310 and Exynos 9611, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T310 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T310 specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.