MediaTek Helio A25 vs Samsung Exynos 9611

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio A25 vs Samsung Exynos 9611, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and PowerVR GE8320.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio A25 is octa-core (Cortex-A53) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, Octane V2, Neocore, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Helio A25 or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio A25

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio A25

67%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio A25

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio A25	Exynos 9611
Total score	95484	155435
CPU	26741	43530
GPU	36292	59071
MEM	15269	24864
UX	17181	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio A25	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	247	318
Multi-Core	1112	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio A25	Exynos 9611
Frequency	1800 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4GB Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz	1866
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 21% better than Helio A25 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	161
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	1600 x 720 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	20.5	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	35.4	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	22.8	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	17.8	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	21.3	39.5
Real Racing 3	62	57.3
Sniper 3D	56.6	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	63.7	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	51.3	73.3
CSR Racing 2	46	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A25 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 30
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio A25 and Exynos 9611, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio A25 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio A25 specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.