MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 950

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 950, compare of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and PowerVR GE8320.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT8768T or Kirin 950 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Kirin 950

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Kirin 950

48%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Kirin 950

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Kirin 950
Total score	93268	100285
CPU	26105	28073
GPU	35434	38102
MEM	14916	16044
UX	16782	18046

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Kirin 950
Single-Core	241	265
Multi-Core	1086	902

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Kirin 950
Frequency	2300 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1600
Memory bandwidth	14	25.6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	122.31
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	22.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	38.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	25.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	19.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	24.3
Real Racing 3	42.1	48.4
Sniper 3D	74.1	61.9
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	54.2
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	61.9
CSR Racing 2	43.8	42.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	20 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 11
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 22
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Kirin 950 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 950 specs and review.