HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 9611 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 710F vs Exynos 9611

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 9611, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G71 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, and how good the chipsets are in games Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Kirin 710F or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 710F

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 710F

62%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 710F

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9611
Total score	132067	155435
CPU	36974	43530
GPU	50180	59071
MEM	21140	24864
UX	23762	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	270	318
Multi-Core	1188	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 9611
Frequency	2200 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	1866
Memory bandwidth
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 4% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP4	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	169	161
# of Cores	4	3
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	24.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	48.1	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	60.7	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	27.4	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	42.8	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	62.4	39.5
Real Racing 3	75.9	57.3
Sniper 3D	115.3	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	97.1	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	78.9	73.3
CSR Racing 2	85	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 19
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.