|
Unisoc Tiger T603 vs Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|
Comparisons 06-11-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc Tiger T603 vs Samsung Exynos 9611, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Tiger T603 or Exynos 9611.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T603 | 9% |
Exynos 9611 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T603 | 71% |
Exynos 9611 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T603 | 6% |
Exynos 9611 | 9% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T603 |
Exynos 9611 | Total score | 215040 | 155435 | CPU | 60202 | 43530 | GPU | 81708 | 59071 | MEM | 34399 | 24864 | UX | 38709 | 27987 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T603 |
Exynos 9611 | Single-Core | 382 | 318 | Multi-Core | 1486 | 1338 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T603 |
Exynos 9611 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 21% better than Tiger T603 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 332.53 | 161 | # of Cores | 1 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 20.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 40.1 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 46.9 | 45.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 36.6 | 39.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.9 | 28.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 50.6 | 39.5 | Real Racing 3 | 81.3 | 57.3 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 73.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.6 | 73.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 74.4 | 73.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.7 | 59.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T603 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 13 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T603 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
Exynos 9611 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|