MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-G71 MP3.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT8768T or Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

56%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Total score	93268	92314
CPU	26105	25851
GPU	35434	35084
MEM	14916	14780
UX	16782	16607

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Single-Core	241	238
Multi-Core	1086	1075

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Frequency	2300 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	6
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1650
Memory bandwidth	14	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 13% better than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8768T has -2 more core than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G71 MP3
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	1200 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	124
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1200 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	18.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	32.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	20.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	15.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	19.8
Real Racing 3	42.1	56.7
Sniper 3D	74.1	71.3
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	58.3
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	51.8
CSR Racing 2	43.8	42.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	21.7 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.7 2CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 16
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT8768T and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 specs and review.