MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Samsung Exynos 9611 benchmark which processor is better

Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Exynos 9611

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Samsung Exynos 9611, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G72 MP3.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio P65 (MT6768)

11%

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio P65 (MT6768)

64%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio P65 (MT6768)

10%

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 9611
Total score	166391	155435
CPU	46583	43530
GPU	63232	59071
MEM	26621	24864
UX	29954	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	341	318
Multi-Core	1432	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 9611
Frequency	2000 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		8 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1800	1866
Memory bandwidth	13.41
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 13% better than Helio P65 (MT6768) in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G72 MP3	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	184	161
# of Cores	3	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	21.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	25.5	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	55.9	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.7	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.9	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.7	39.5
Real Racing 3	69.9	57.3
Sniper 3D	72.7	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	78.3	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	64.3	73.3
CSR Racing 2	61.5	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	4G LTE WorldMode modem	LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 15
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio P65 (MT6768) and Exynos 9611, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio P65 (MT6768) specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.