MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 9609

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8768T vs Samsung Exynos 9609, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-G72 MP3.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 9609 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8768T or Exynos 9609 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Exynos 9609

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Exynos 9609

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Exynos 9609

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Exynos 9609
Total score	93268	144347
CPU	26105	40426
GPU	35434	54842
MEM	14916	23097
UX	16782	25980

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Exynos 9609
Single-Core	241	295
Multi-Core	1086	1299

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Exynos 9609
Frequency	2300 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1866
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 4% better than Exynos 9609 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	161
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		25.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	25.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	51.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	26.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	20.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	35.9
Real Racing 3	42.1	90.7
Sniper 3D	74.1	82.9
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	62.2
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	75.1
CSR Racing 2	43.8	62.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9609 is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Exynos 9609 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9609 specs and review.