Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9611

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9611, compare of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G52 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Tiger T610 or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T610

12%

Exynos 9611

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T610

67%

Exynos 9611

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T610

11%

Exynos 9611

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9611
Total score	169746	155435
CPU	47534	43530
GPU	64512	59071
MEM	27164	24864
UX	30555	27987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9611
Single-Core	278	318
Multi-Core	917	1338

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9611
Frequency	1800 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1866
Memory bandwidth	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.1-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 21% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G52 MP2	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	614 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	302.51	161
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	21.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	26.5	29.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.9	45.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.2	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.7	28.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.7	39.5
Real Racing 3	85.4	57.3
Sniper 3D	91	73.3
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	73.3
Mortal Kombat X	74	73.3
CSR Racing 2	62.6	59.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 17
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T610 specs and review.

Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9611 specs and review.