Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Samsung Exynos 9611 benchmark which processor is better

Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Exynos 9611

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Samsung Exynos 9611, compare of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G71 MP18.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9611 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7884 or Exynos 9611 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Samsung Exynos 9611

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 7 Octa 78848% Exynos 961111%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 7 Octa 788457% Exynos 961168%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 7 Octa 78845% Exynos 96119%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Exynos 9611
Total score116251155435
CPU3254943530
GPU4417059071
MEM1859124864
UX2092627987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Exynos 9611
Single-Core337318
Multi-Core10461338

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Exynos 9611
Frequency1600 MHz2300 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)5 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661866
Memory bandwidth24
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB
L2 cache512 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 30% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G71 MP18Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency546 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS334161
# of Cores183
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile23.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)44.629.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra47.345.8
Call of Duty: Mobile25.339.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)40.728.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition58.939.5
Real Racing 382.857.3
Sniper 3D61.573.3
Need for Speed No Limits66.273.3
Mortal Kombat X75.773.3
CSR Racing 266.259.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution28 MP64 MP
Dual Camera resolution28 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS30120
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.13 3CALTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed600 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Exynos 9611 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Helio G70
• Vs Exynos 880
• Vs Snapdragon 712
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562


Exynos 9611 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands