 |
MediaTek MT8768T vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8768T vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X), speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and PowerVR GE8320. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Helio X27 (MT6797X) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8768T or Helio X27 (MT6797X) and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT8768T | 6% |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | 7% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8768T | 34% |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | 41% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT8768T | 5% |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | 4% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8768T |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | Total score | 93268 | 98106 | CPU | 26105 | 27468 | GPU | 35434 | 37277 | MEM | 14916 | 15689 | UX | 16782 | 17655 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8768T |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | Single-Core | 241 | 253 | Multi-Core | 1086 | 1142 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8768T |
Helio X27 (MT6797X) | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X27 (MT6797X) is 11% better than MT8768T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8768T has 2 more core than Helio X27 (MT6797X). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 875 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 118.91 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.9 | 21.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 33.7 | 37.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.2 | 24.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.1 | 18.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 19.8 | 23.4 | Real Racing 3 | 42.1 | 75.6 | Sniper 3D | 74.1 | 60.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 40.4 | 68 | Mortal Kombat X | 38.8 | 60.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 43.8 | 52.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 100 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) is better: 24 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT8768T SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Helio X27 (MT6797X) SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|