 |
MediaTek MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, compare of GPUs Adreno 610 and PowerVR GE8320. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 665 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT8768T or Snapdragon 665 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT8768T | 6% |
Snapdragon 665 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8768T | 34% |
Snapdragon 665 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT8768T | 5% |
Snapdragon 665 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8768T |
Snapdragon 665 | Total score | 93268 | 153366 | CPU | 26105 | 42942 | GPU | 35434 | 58273 | MEM | 14916 | 24532 | UX | 16782 | 27605 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8768T |
Snapdragon 665 | Single-Core | 241 | 314 | Multi-Core | 1086 | 1320 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8768T |
Snapdragon 665 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 13% better than Snapdragon 665 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 312 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 29.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.9 | 28.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 33.7 | 55.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.2 | 30.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.1 | 23.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 19.8 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 42.1 | 83.3 | Sniper 3D | 74.1 | 122.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 40.4 | 99.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 38.8 | 88.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 43.8 | 66.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 165 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 100 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GLONASS, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 is better: 30 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT8768T and Snapdragon 665, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8768T SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Snapdragon 665 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|