MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and PowerVR GE8320.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Octane V2, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8768T or Kirin 710F and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Kirin 710F

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Kirin 710F

62%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Kirin 710F

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Kirin 710F
Total score	93268	132067
CPU	26105	36974
GPU	35434	50180
MEM	14916	21140
UX	16782	23762

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Kirin 710F
Single-Core	241	270
Multi-Core	1086	1188

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Kirin 710F
Frequency	2300 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	933
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 4% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G71 MP4
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	169
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		24.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	48.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	60.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	27.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	42.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	62.4
Real Racing 3	42.1	75.9
Sniper 3D	74.1	115.3
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	97.1
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	78.9
CSR Racing 2	43.8	85

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT8768T and Kirin 710F, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.