MediaTek MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, comparison of GPUs Adreno 615 and PowerVR GE8320.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Geekbench, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8768T or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Snapdragon 670

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Snapdragon 670

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Snapdragon 670

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Snapdragon 670
Total score	93268	151765
CPU	26105	42500
GPU	35434	57660
MEM	14916	24290
UX	16782	27322

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Snapdragon 670
Single-Core	241	311
Multi-Core	1086	1306

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Snapdragon 670
Frequency	2300 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1866
Memory bandwidth	14	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 13% better than Snapdragon 670 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Adreno 615
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	448
# of Cores	2
# of Shader Units		256
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	27.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	54.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	29.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	22.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	38.7
Real Racing 3	42.1	95.7
Sniper 3D	74.1	103.9
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	65.6
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	71.1
CSR Racing 2	43.8	60.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 31
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT8768T and Snapdragon 670, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Snapdragon 670 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 670 specs and review.