|
Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|
Comparisons 26-08-2021 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs Samsung Exynos 9611, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy T740 Tanggula or Exynos 9611.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT740 Tanggula | 17% |
Exynos 9611 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T740 Tanggula | 68% |
Exynos 9611 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT740 Tanggula | 15% |
Exynos 9611 | 9% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T740 Tanggula |
Exynos 9611 | Total score | 243859 | 155435 | CPU | 68270 | 43530 | GPU | 92672 | 59071 | MEM | 39021 | 24864 | UX | 43885 | 27987 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T740 Tanggula |
Exynos 9611 | Single-Core | 503 | 318 | Multi-Core | 2012 | 1338 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T740 Tanggula |
Exynos 9611 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 32 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9611 is 13% better than T740 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 204 | 161 | # of Cores | 3 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 32.1 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.3 | 45.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.2 | 39.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 24.1 | 28.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 37.1 | 39.5 | Real Racing 3 | 72.6 | 57.3 | Sniper 3D | 93.6 | 73.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.4 | 73.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 93.2 | 73.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 69.3 | 59.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA | Download speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 750 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T740 Tanggula is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9611 is better: 8 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
T740 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 9611 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|