MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8768T vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and PowerVR GE8320.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 710A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, Octane V2, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chips in Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG etc.

After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MT8768T or Kirin 710A and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8768T

Kirin 710A

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8768T

34%

Kirin 710A

58%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8768T

Kirin 710A

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8768T	Kirin 710A
Total score	93268	132403
CPU	26105	37068
GPU	35434	50304
MEM	14916	21184
UX	16782	23842

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8768T	Kirin 710A
Single-Core	241	270
Multi-Core	1086	1191

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8768T	Kirin 710A
Frequency	2300 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	933
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 4% better than Kirin 710A in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G71 MP4
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	169
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		25.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.9	49.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.7	61.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.2	28.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	43.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.8	63.6
Real Racing 3	42.1	108
Sniper 3D	74.1	117.2
Need for Speed No Limits	40.4	74
Mortal Kombat X	38.8	89.5
CSR Racing 2	43.8	74

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710A is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT8768T and Kirin 710A, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.

Kirin 710A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710A specs and review.