MediaTek MT8176 vs MediaTek MT8768T

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8176 vs MediaTek MT8768T, compare of GPUs PowerVR GX6250 and PowerVR GE8320.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8176 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and MT8768T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Quadrant, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MT8176 or MT8768T and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8176

MT8768T

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8176

26%

MT8768T

34%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8176

MT8768T

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8176	MT8768T
Total score	82111	93268
CPU	22987	26105
GPU	31198	35434
MEM	13130	14916
UX	14787	16782

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8176	MT8768T
Single-Core	212	241
Multi-Core	956	1086

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8176	MT8768T
Frequency	2100 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	800
Memory bandwidth	14	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8768T is 8% better than MT8176 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8176 has 2 more core than MT8768T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GX6250	PowerVR GE8320
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	83.2	126.8
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	2400 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.5	18.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.3	33.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.6	20.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.3	15.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.6	19.8
Real Racing 3	42.5	42.1
Sniper 3D	36.8	74.1
Need for Speed No Limits	34	40.4
Mortal Kombat X	45.3	38.8
CSR Racing 2	36.8	43.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	25 MP
Dual Camera resolution		13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	4K HEVC (h.265), H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		100 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8176 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT8176 and MT8768T, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8176 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8176 specs and review.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.